Metrics and rankings: Myths and fallacies

7Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper we provide an introduction to the field of Bibliometrics. In particular, first we briefly describe its beginning and its evolution; we mention the main research fora as well. Further we categorize metrics according to their entity scope: metrics for journals, conferences and authors. Several rankings have appeared based on such metrics. It is argued that these metrics and rankings should be treated with caution, in a light relative way and not in an absolute manner. Primarily, it is the human expertise that can rigorously evaluate the above entities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Manolopoulos, Y., & Katsaros, D. (2017). Metrics and rankings: Myths and fallacies. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 706, pp. 265–280). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57135-5_19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free