Acknowledging strength in plurality: The world social forum 2016 through the prism of assemblage thinking

0Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this article, we contribute to debates regarding the nature and role of the World Social Forum (WSF) in the post-2010 period by employing the prism of assemblage thinking. By using the WSF 2016 held in Montreal, Canada as a case study, we outline the political potential of the assemblage approach, which allows activists and researchers of social justice and contemporary contentious spaces to address some of the intrinsic paradoxes in such mobilizations. The observation of some paradigmatic moments from the WSF 2016 offers a glimpse into the heterogeneity that shapes it. We address elements as diverse as actors' intentionalities, migration policies, urban landscapes, power relations, contents, and absences, arguing that assemblage thinking opens up innovative possibilities for analyzing multidimensional phenomena such as the WSF.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lorin, C. M., & Schall, N. (2018). Acknowledging strength in plurality: The world social forum 2016 through the prism of assemblage thinking. Studies in Social Justice, 12(1), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.26522/SSJ.V12I1.1583

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free