Women and Other ‘Others’

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In his 1988 historiographical article ’Seeing the Past’ Roy Porter stressed the regrettable lack of interest that satirical print scholars had shown towards representations of Georgian women.1 Porter’s challenge was taken up by Cindy McCreery in her 2004 publication The Satirical Gaze which, while enlightening in some respects, was not without its drawbacks.2 McCreery omitted discussions of images of foreign women and the use of female figures as emblems. It was in this latter category that Porter felt female characters were ‘most strikingly present’ in print culture, personifying concepts such as Britannia, Virtue, Justice, and Liberty.3 Tamara Hunt assessed some of Britannia’s many uses in Defining John Bull, noting Britannia’s versatility, her prominence in prints on the conflict with America, the decline of her utilisation after 1785 and her ousting by John Bull as national symbol.4

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moores, J. R. (2015). Women and Other ‘Others.’ In War, Culture and Society, 1750-1850 (pp. 177–206). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137380142_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free