Is blood versus crystalloid cardioplegia relevant? Significantly improved protection may require new cardioplegic concepts!

6Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The predominant method of myocardial protection during cardiac surgery is hyperkalaemic cardioplegia, inducing depolarised arrest. Since its development in the 1970s, the only real change has been to alter the vehicle to blood. Although blood cardioplegia was shown to be 'superior' to crystalloid cardioplegia, this advantage is marginal and might explain the continuous use of crystalloid cardioplegia by some surgeons. To achieve significant improvements in cardioplegic protection, more radical and conceptual changes in the solution, such as those potentially achieved by 'polarised' arrest, should be explored. © 2008 Published by European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fallouh, H. B., & Chambers, D. J. (2008). Is blood versus crystalloid cardioplegia relevant? Significantly improved protection may require new cardioplegic concepts! Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 7(6), 1162–1163. https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2008.186494

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free