A comparison of machine learning methods for the diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions

217Citations
Citations of this article
198Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We analyze the discriminatory power of k-nearest neighbors, logistic regression, artificial neural networks (ANNs), decision tress, and support vector machines (SVMs) on the task of classifying pigmented skin lesions as common nevi, dysplastic nevi, or melanoma. Three different classification tasks were used as benchmarks: the dichotomous problem of distinguishing common nevi from dysplastic nevi and melanoma, the dichotomous problem of distinguishing melanoma from common and dysplastic nevi, and the trichotomous problem of correctly distinguishing all three classes. Using ROC analysis to measure the discriminatory power of the methods shows that excellent results for specific classification problems in the domain of pigmented skin lesions can be achieved with machine-learning methods. On both dichotomous and trichotomous tasks, logistic regression, ANNs, and SVMs performed on about the same level, with κ-nearest neighbors and decision trees performing worse. © 2001 Academic Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dreiseitl, S., Ohno-Machado, L., Kittler, H., Vinterbo, S., Billhardt, H., & Binder, M. (2001). A comparison of machine learning methods for the diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 34(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1006/jbin.2001.1004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free