Machine medical ethics and robot law: Legal necessity or science fiction?

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The law is developed by human beings, for human beings, in legal terms, for “natural persons”. But during the development of the law in the long journey from the Roman legal system until our modern law system many things have changed. Natural persons are not the only players in the legal system of today. Large and smaller enterprises, organizations and state entities are performing all kinds of legal acts, as legal persons they can be held liable for the things they do. What about intelligence machines that can perform autonomous or semiautonomous tasks? What about an advanced operating system where human control is hardly noticeable? What about drones operating independently? Are they liable for their acts and, most important, their mistakes? What about the laser cut that went wrong because of a disturbance in the internet that the surgeon did not control? Is the man behind the screen always the responsible party, even if he is not behind the screen? This article will discuss these ongoing questions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van den Hoven van Genderen, R. (2015). Machine medical ethics and robot law: Legal necessity or science fiction? Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, 74, 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08108-3_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free