Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics predict local recurrence in patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage non-Small cell lung cancer: A multicentric study

141Citations
Citations of this article
102Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective multicentric study was to develop and evaluate a prognostic 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomic signature in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Methods: Patients from 3 different centers (n 5 27, 29, and 8) were pooled to constitute the training set, whereas the patients from a fourth center (n 5 23) were used as the testing set. The primary endpoint was local control. The primary tumor was semiautomatically delineated in the PET images using the fuzzy locally adaptive Bayesian algorithm, and manually in the low-dose CT images. In total, 184 Image Biomarkers Standardization Initiative-compliant radiomic features were extracted. Seven clinical and treatment parameters were included. We used ComBat to harmonize radiomic features extracted from the 4 institutions relying on different PET/CT scanners. In the training set, variables found significant in the univariate analysis were fed into a multivariate regression model, and models were built by combining independent prognostic factors. Results: Median follow-up was 21.1 mo (range, 1.7-63.4 mo) and 25.5 mo (range, 7.7-57.8 mo) in training and testing sets, respectively. In univariate analysis, none of the clinical variables, 2 PET features, and 2 CT features were significantly predictive of local control. The best predictive models in the training set were obtained by combining one feature from PET (Information Correlation 2) and one feature from CT (flatness), reaching a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 96%. Another model combining 2 PET features (Information Correlation 2 and strength) reached sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 88%, both with an undefined hazard ratio (P, 0.001). The latter model obtained an accuracy of 0.91 (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 81%), with a hazard ratio undefined (P 5 0.023) in the testing set; however, other models relying on CT radiomic features only or the combination of PET and CT features failed to validate in the testing set. Conclusion: We showed that 2 radiomic features derived from 18F-FDG PET were independently associated with local control in patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing SBRT and could be combined in an accurate predictive model. This model could provide local relapse-related information and could be helpful in clinical decision making.

References Powered by Scopus

FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0

2420Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for inoperable early stage lung cancer

2165Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus lobectomy for operable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: A pooled analysis of two randomised trials

1275Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The promise of artificial intelligence and deep learning in PET and SPECT imaging

190Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Radiomics and deep learning in lung cancer

186Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Performance comparison of modified ComBat for harmonization of radiomic features for multicenter studies

138Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dissaux, G., Visvikis, D., Daano, R., Pradier, O., Chajon, E., Barillot, I., … Schick, U. (2020). Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics predict local recurrence in patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage non-Small cell lung cancer: A multicentric study. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 61(6), 814–820. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.228106

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 31

66%

Researcher 13

28%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 25

60%

Physics and Astronomy 7

17%

Engineering 6

14%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0