A survey of the clinical acceptability of screening for postnatal depression in depressed and non-depressed women

76Citations
Citations of this article
100Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Information on clinical acceptability is needed when making cost-utility decisions about health screening implementation. Despite being in use for two decades, most data on the clinical acceptability of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) come from qualitative reports, or include relatively small samples of depressed women. This study aimed to measure acceptability in a survey of a relatively large, community sample with a high representation of clinically depressed women. Methods: Using mail, telephone and face-to-face interview, 920 postnatal women were approached to take part in a survey on the acceptability of the EPDS, including 601 women who had screened positive for depression and 245 who had received DSM-IV diagnoses of depression. Acceptability was measured on a 5-point Likert scale of comfort ranging from "Not Comfortable", through "Comfortable" to "Very Comfortable". Results: The response rate was just over half for postal surveys (52%) and was 100% for telephone and face-to-face surveys (432, 21 and 26 respondents for postal, telephone and face-to-face surveys respectively) making 479 respondents in total. Of these, 81.2% indicated that screening with the EPDS had been in the range of "Comfortable" to "Very Comfortable". The other 18.8 % rated screening below the "Comfortable" point, including a small fraction (4.3%) who rated answering questions on the EPDS as "Not Comfortable" at the extreme end of the scale. Comfort was inversely related to EPDS score, but the absolute size of this effect was small. Almost all respondents (97%) felt that screening was desirable. Conclusion: The EPDS had good acceptability in this study for depressed and non-depressed women. Women's views on the desirability of postnatal depression screening appear to be largely independent of personal level of comfort with screening. These results should be useful to policy-makers and are broadly supportive of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale as a suitable tool for universal perinatal depression screening. © 2006 Gemmill et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Detection of Postnatal Depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression scale

10751Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The validation of the Edinburgh Post-natal Depression Scale on a community sample

768Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The edinburgh postnatal depression scale: Validation for an Australian sample

301Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Antenatal risk factors for postnatal depression: A large prospective study

725Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Postpartum depression screening: Importance, methods, barriers, and recommendations for practice

245Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Methods to identify postnatal depression in primary care: An integrated evidence synthesis and value of information analysis

192Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gemmill, A. W., Leigh, B., Ericksen, J., & Milgrom, J. (2006). A survey of the clinical acceptability of screening for postnatal depression in depressed and non-depressed women. BMC Public Health, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-211

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 47

73%

Researcher 9

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 24

37%

Psychology 17

26%

Nursing and Health Professions 15

23%

Social Sciences 9

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free