Pesticide toxicity index-a tool for assessing potential toxicity of pesticide mixtures to freshwater aquatic organisms

105Citations
Citations of this article
235Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Pesticide mixtures are common in streams with agricultural or urban influence in the watershed. The Pesticide Toxicity Index (PTI) is a screening tool to assess potential aquatic toxicity of complex pesticide mixtures by combining measures of pesticide exposure and acute toxicity in an additive toxic-unit model. The PTI is determined separately for fish, cladocerans, and benthic invertebrates. This study expands the number of pesticides and degradates included in previous editions of the PTI from 124 to 492 pesticides and degradates, and includes two types of PTI for use in different applications, depending on study objectives. The Median-PTI was calculated from median toxicity values for individual pesticides, so is robust to outliers and is appropriate for comparing relative potential toxicity among samples, sites, or pesticides. The Sensitive-PTI uses the 5th percentile of available toxicity values, so is a more sensitive screening-level indicator of potential toxicity. PTI predictions of toxicity in environmental samples were tested using data aggregated from published field studies that measured pesticide concentrations and toxicity to Ceriodaphnia dubia in ambient stream water. C. dubia survival was reduced to ≤ 50% of controls in 44% of samples with Median-PTI values of 0.1-1, and to 0% in 96% of samples with Median-PTI values > 1. The PTI is a relative, but quantitative, indicator of potential toxicity that can be used to evaluate relationships between pesticide exposure and biological condition. © 2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nowell, L. H., Norman, J. E., Moran, P. W., Martin, J. D., & Stone, W. W. (2014). Pesticide toxicity index-a tool for assessing potential toxicity of pesticide mixtures to freshwater aquatic organisms. Science of the Total Environment, 476477, 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.088

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free