Axial length measurement acquisition rates of two optical biometers in cataractous eyes

15Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the ability of two optical biometers to acquire the axial length (AL) measurement in cataractous eyes. Methods: This prospective, comparative, single-center study comprised 105 eyes (63 patients). AL was acquired by the composite mean value of 20 measurements (composite-20 IM) and five measurements (composite-5 IM) (IOLMaster® 500 version 7.1 software), and the standard mean value of the first five measurements (standard-5 LS, Lenstar LS 900®). Anterior chamber depth (ACD) and average keratometry (K) readings were acquired. Results: AL was acquired in 83.8%, 92.4%, and 84.8% of eyes for the composite-5 IM, composite-20 IM, and standard-5 LS, respectively. Standard-5 LS AL measurements were significantly shorter (P<0.001). IOLMaster® 500-acquired ACD (corneal epithelium to lens) measurements were significantly shorter (P<0.001). IOLMaster® 500 average K measurements were significantly steeper (P<0.001). Conclusion: The composite-20 IM had the highest AL acquisition success rate of the three versions evaluated. AL, ACD, and average Ks were statistically different between the two biometers, although the differences were clinically insignificant. © 2014 Epitropoulos.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Epitropoulos, A. (2014). Axial length measurement acquisition rates of two optical biometers in cataractous eyes. Clinical Ophthalmology, 8, 1369–1376. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S62653

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free