A randomized trial of mail and email recruitment strategies for a physician survey on clinical trial accrual

23Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Patient participation in cancer clinical trials is suboptimal. A challenge to capturing physicians' insights about trials has been low response to surveys. We conducted a study using varying combinations of mail and email to recruit a nationally representative sample of medical, surgical, and radiation oncologists to complete a survey on trial accrual. Methods: We randomly assigned eligible physicians identified from the American Medical Association MasterFile (n = 13,251) to mail-or email-based recruitment strategies. Mail-based recruitment included a survey packet with: (1) cover letter describing the survey and inviting participation; (2) paper copy of the survey and postage-paid return envelope; and (3) a web link for completing the survey online. Email-based recruitment included an e-mail describing the survey and inviting participation, along with the web link to the survey, and a reminder postcard 2 weeks later. Results: Response was higher for mail-based (11.8, 95% CI 11.0-12.6%) vs. email-based (4.5, 95% CI 4.0-5.0%) recruitment. In email-based recruitment, only one-quarter of recipients opened the email, and even fewer clicked on the link to complete the survey. Most physicians in mail-based recruitment responded after the first invitation (362 of 770 responders, 47.0%). A higher proportion of responders vs. non-responders were young (ages 25-44 years), men, and radiation or surgical (vs. medical) oncologists. Conclusions: Most physicians assigned to mail-based recruitment actually completed the survey online via the link provided in the cover letter, and those in email-based recruitment did not respond until they received a reminder postcard by mail. Providing the option to return a paper survey or complete it online may have further increased participation in the mail-based group, and future studies should examine how combinations of delivery mode and return options affect physicians' response to surveys.

References Powered by Scopus

Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support

36139Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Participation in cancer clinical trials: Race-, sex-, and age-based disparities

1787Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians: A systematic review

562Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires

74Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Experience, perceptions, and recommendations concerning COVID-19-related clinical research adjustments

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Accessing Targeted Therapies: A Potential Roadblock to Implementing Precision Oncology?

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Murphy, C. C., Craddock Lee, S. J., Geiger, A. M., Cox, J. V., Ahn, C., Nair, R., … Skinner, C. S. (2020). A randomized trial of mail and email recruitment strategies for a physician survey on clinical trial accrual. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01014-x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 6

46%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

15%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 6

46%

Sports and Recreations 3

23%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

15%

Psychology 2

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free