Particles: Presupposition Triggers, Context Markers or Speech Act Markers

  • Zeevat H
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper discusses two possible formal approaches to the semantic/pragmatic characterisation of a subclass of the modal particles. It may well be that the approaches can be applied to other particles or that they can be applied to certain intonational patterns (e.g. contrastive stress), to morphemes (past tense, agreement) or to words (pronouns), constructions (some uses of denite descriptions, clefts), but I will not try to to show that here. The rst approach is based on the optimality theoretic reconstruction of Blutner & J¨ ager (2000) of the theory of presupposition that has become fairly standard, the Heim (1983) and van der Sandt (1992) view of presuppositions as anaphora (see Zeevat (1992) for an introduction and comparison). The rst half of the paper critically reviews my earlier views on the treatment of particles in this setting, the second part introduces a novel view, again based on optimality theory, which takes as a starting point the marking constraints that are a necessary ingredient of my earlier treatment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zeevat, H. (2004). Particles: Presupposition Triggers, Context Markers or Speech Act Markers. In Optimality Theory and Pragmatics (pp. 91–111). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230501409_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free