Comparing high-intensity versus moderate-intensity exercise training in coronary artery disease patients: a randomized controlled trial with 6- and 12-month follow-up

0Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the long-term effects of two exercise-based CR programs on physical activity (PA), sedentary behavior, physical fitness, quality of life (QoL), and mental health in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. Subject and methods: Seventy-two CAD participants were randomized (1:1:1) into HIIT, MICT, and control groups. Both training programs spanned 6 weeks with three supervised treadmill exercise sessions per week. MICT targeted ≈70–75% of peak heart rate (HR), while HIIT aimed for ≈85–95% of peak HR. The control group adhered to standard medical recommendations. Assessments at 6- and 12-months post-intervention included body composition, aerobic capacity, muscle strength, PA, SB, QoL, anxiety, and depression. Results: Over the 6- and 12-month follow-up periods, both exercise groups maintained the levels of aerobic capacity (HIIT ≈ 19.6 ml kg−1 min−1, MICT ≈ 17.8 ml kg−1 min−1), QoL, and PA compared to baseline (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gonçalves, C., Bravo, J., Abreu, A., Pais, J., & Raimundo, A. (2024). Comparing high-intensity versus moderate-intensity exercise training in coronary artery disease patients: a randomized controlled trial with 6- and 12-month follow-up. Journal of Public Health (Germany). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-024-02224-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free