Most studies dealing with analogy or comparison emphasize the pervasive character of the discursive processes they refer to, and regret the lack of any satisfactory theoretical account for them. The present paper tries to take a more positive stance: it starts from the many insightful essays on comparative arguments and proposes to make them enter into dialogue with actual argumentative practices.
CITATION STYLE
Doury, M. (2009). Argument Schemes Typologies in Practice: The Case of Comparative Arguments. In Argumentation Library (Vol. 14, pp. 141–155). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9165-0_11
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.