Optimization of cell culture-derived influenza A virus particles purification using sulfated cellulose membrane adsorbers

24Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Downstream processing remains one of the biggest challenges in manufacturing of biologicals and vaccines. This work focuses on a Design of Experiments approach to understand factors influencing the performance of sulfated cellulose membrane adsorbers for the chromatographic purification of a cell culture-derived H1N1 influenza virus strain (A/Puerto Rico/8/34). Membranes with a medium ligand density together with low conductivity and a high virus titer in the feed stream resulted in optimum virus yields and low protein and DNA content in the product fraction. Flow rate and salt concentration in the buffer used for elution were of secondary importance while membrane permeability had no significant impact on separation performance. A virus loss of 2.1% in the flow through, a yield of 57.4% together with a contamination level of 5.1 pgDNA HAU−1 and 1.2 ngprot HAU−1 were experimentally confirmed for the optimal operating point predicted. The critical process parameters identified and their optimal settings should support the optimization of sulfated cellulose membrane adsorbers based purification trains for other influenza virus strains, streamlining cell culture-derived vaccine manufacturing.

References Powered by Scopus

783Citations
408Readers
Get full text

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text
36Citations
57Readers

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fortuna, A. R., Taft, F., Villain, L., Wolff, M. W., & Reichl, U. (2018). Optimization of cell culture-derived influenza A virus particles purification using sulfated cellulose membrane adsorbers. Engineering in Life Sciences, 18(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201700108

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

60%

Researcher 7

35%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Chemical Engineering 6

35%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

24%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

24%

Engineering 3

18%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0