Isoflurane does not increase the incidence of intraoperative myocardial ischaemia compared with halothane during vascular surgery

10Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We have studied the incidence of new intra-operative myocardial ischaemia (IMI), myocardial infarction (Ml) and cardiac death (CD) in 500 consecutive patients undergoing elective major non-cardiac vascular surgery. Patients were allocated randomly to receive either halothane (n = 226) or isoflurane (n = 274) as principal anaesthetic agent. Using real-time ST segment trend analysis (leads V5 and II) IMI (halothane 39%, isoflurane 38%), MI (halothane 1.3%, isoflurane 1.5%) and CD (halothane 0.4%, isoflurane 0.7%) did not differ significantly between the two groups. Twenty-three per cent of IMI episodes were related to haemodynamic disturbances, but unrelated to the type of surgery: 148 supra-aortic (IMI = 39%), 244 abdominal aortic (IMI = 41%) and 108 lower extremity revascularizations (IMI = 33%). We conclude that the choice of volatile anaesthetic agent does not influence cardiac morbidity or mortality in this type of patient. © 1992 British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stühmeier, K. D., Mainzer, B., Sandmann, W., & Tarnow, J. (1992). Isoflurane does not increase the incidence of intraoperative myocardial ischaemia compared with halothane during vascular surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 69(6), 602–606. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/69.6.602

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free