Specific ammonium oxidation and denitrification rates in an MBR treating real textile wastewater for simultaneous carbon and nitrogen removal

1Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dissolved oxygen (DO) and aeration on/off time are the determining parameters for simultaneous carbon and nitrogen removal in biological treatment processes. The most effective way to decide the optimum operational conditions, e.g. aeration on/off time or DO concentration during the aeration period, is to determine specific nitrification/denitrification rates. For this purpose, the effects of DO (6 and 3 mg L−1) and aeration on/off time (from 2/2 to 90/360 min) on the specific ammonium oxidation and denitritation/denitrification rates in a membrane bioreactor (MBR) treating real textile wastewater were deeply investigated. RESULTS: The highest specific ammonium oxidation, denitritation and denitrification rates were obtained as 5.4, 3.8, and 5.3 mg N g−1 volatile suspended solids h−1, respectively, at an aeration on/off time of 90/360 min, which corresponded to the increase in specific ammonium oxidation rates by 1.8 and 2.1 times compared to continuous aeration conditions where DO was 6 and 3 mg L−1, respectively. CONCLUSION: Higher specific ammonium oxidation and denitrification rates can be achieved with the intermittent aeration compared to continuous aeration. Hence existing treatment plants can be retrofitted for higher performance with reduced energy requirements. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry (SCI).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yilmaz, T., Demir, E. K., Başaran, S. T., Çokgör, E. U., & Sahinkaya, E. (2023). Specific ammonium oxidation and denitrification rates in an MBR treating real textile wastewater for simultaneous carbon and nitrogen removal. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 98(12), 2859–2867. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.7492

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free