How to interpret meta-analysis models: Fixed effect and random effects meta-analyses

108Citations
Citations of this article
132Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This section of the journal is aimed at providing the essential information readers should know about the topics that are addressed in the 'Statistics in practice' paper published in the same issue of the journal. This stand-alone section has to be seen as an articulated summary of the main notions clinicians have to know about some basic concepts in statistics, which may be useful for their evidence-based practice. After going through these notes, readers are encouraged to read the 'Statistics in practice' articles. Of course, we welcome any feedback from you (via email or Twitter) about this!.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nikolakopoulou, A., Mavridis, D., & Salanti, G. (2014). How to interpret meta-analysis models: Fixed effect and random effects meta-analyses. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 17(2), 64. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2014-101794

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free