Amniotic fluid volume assessment: Eight lessons learned

9Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Actual AFV can be determined by a dye-dilution technique or be directly measured at cesarean. This allows investigators to correlate estimated and actual AFVs. Lessons learned by assessing the relationship of estimated to actual AFVs. 1) Ultrasound estimates normal actual AFVs well, but abnormal AFVs poorly. 2) Quantile regression is a better statistical methodology to create a normal AFV curve across pregnancy. 3) There is no difference in the accuracy of the subjective (visualization without measurements) compared with the objective (visualization with measurements) technique in identifying normal and abnormal AFVs. 4) Color Doppler use leads to the over-diagnosis of oligohydramnios. 5) Intravenous hydration increases actual AFVs. 6) The estimation of AFV can be done with the transducer held perpendicular to the floor or perpendicular to the uterine contour. 7) The single deepest pocket should be used for identifying low AFVs. 8) The AFI should be used for identifying high AFVs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Magann, E. F., Whittington, J. R., Morrison, J. C., & Chauhan, S. P. (2021). Amniotic fluid volume assessment: Eight lessons learned. International Journal of Women’s Health. Dove Medical Press Ltd. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S316841

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free