Argumentation-Based Health Information Systems: A Design Methodology

5Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this article, we present a design methodology for argumentation-based health information systems. With a focus on the application of formal argumentation, the methodology aims at eliciting requirements in regard to argumentation reasoning behavior, knowledge and user models, and business logic on levels below and above the argumentation layer. We highlight specific considerations that need to be made dependent on the system type, i.e., for clinical decision-support systems, patient-facing systems, and administration systems. In addition, we outline challenges in regard to the design of argumentation-based intelligent systems for healthcare, considering the state of the art of argumentation research, health information systems, and software design methods. For each challenge, we outline a mitigation strategy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lindgren, H., Kampik, T., Rosero, E. G., Blusi, M., & Nieves, J. C. (2021). Argumentation-Based Health Information Systems: A Design Methodology. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 36(2), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2020.3044944

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free