Ventilatory ratio and mechanical power in prolonged mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients versus respiratory failures of other etiologies

5Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Evidence suggests differences in ventilation efficiency and respiratory mechanics between early COVID-19 pneumonia and classical acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), as measured by established ventilatory indexes, such as the ventilatory ratio (VR; a surrogate of the pulmonary dead-space fraction) or mechanical power (MP; affected, e.g., by changes in lung-thorax compliance). Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate VR and MP in the late stages of the disease when patients are ready to be liberated from the ventilator after recovering from COVID-19 pneumonia compared to respiratory failures of other etiologies. Design: A retrospective observational cohort study of 249 prolonged mechanically ventilated, tracheotomized patients with and without COVID-19-related respiratory failure. Methods: We analyzed each group’s VR and MP distributions and trajectories [repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA)] during weaning. Secondary outcomes included weaning failure rates between groups and the ability of VR and MP to predict weaning outcomes (using logistic regression models). Results: The analysis compared 53 COVID-19 cases with a heterogeneous group of 196 non-COVID-19 subjects. VR and MP decreased across both groups during weaning. COVID-19 patients demonstrated higher values for both indexes throughout weaning: median VR 1.54 versus 1.27 (p < 0.01) and MP 26.0 versus 21.3 Joule/min (p < 0.01) at the start of weaning, and median VR 1.38 versus 1.24 (p < 0.01) and MP 24.2 versus 20.1 Joule/min (p < 0.01) at weaning completion. According to the multivariable analysis, VR was not independently associated with weaning outcomes, and the ability of MP to predict weaning failure or success varied with lung-thorax compliance, with COVID-19 patients demonstrating consistently higher dynamic compliance along with significantly fewer weaning failures (9% versus 30%, p < 0.01). Conclusion: COVID-19 patients differed considerably in ventilation efficiency and respiratory mechanics among prolonged ventilated individuals, demonstrating significantly higher VRs and MP. The differences in MP were linked with higher lung-thorax compliance in COVID-19 patients, possibly contributing to the lower rate of weaning failures observed.

References Powered by Scopus

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies

9726Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Index for rating diagnostic tests

9042Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Acute respiratory distress syndrome: The Berlin definition

8413Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Mechanical power density, spontaneous breathing indexes, and prolonged weaning failure: a prospective cohort study

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The association of ventilator mechanical power with weaning outcomes in intensive care unit patients: a narrative review

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Is “Optimized Recruitment” Really Worth the Effort?

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ghiani, A., Tsitouras, K., Paderewska, J., Kahnert, K., Walcher, S., Gernhold, L., … Kneidinger, N. (2023). Ventilatory ratio and mechanical power in prolonged mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients versus respiratory failures of other etiologies. Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease, 17. https://doi.org/10.1177/17534666231155744

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

50%

Researcher 2

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 5

50%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

40%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0