Using PPG and Machine Learning to Measure Blood Pressure

1Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Measurement of blood pressure is critical for patients with cardiovascular disease. Using a cuff sphygmomanometer with non-invasive registration is currently the most common practice since its fast and does not require an experienced operator. However, it does not allow continuous pressure monitoring and the discomfort of the procedure can discourage consistent use. Photoplethysmography (PPG) is a technique increasingly used for non-invasive, portable devices to monitor arterial oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ), heart rate and, more recently, for glycemic control. In this study, we evaluate different methods to estimate blood pressure using PPG. Two methods presented are adapted from the literature, while the third is an improvement proposal. Multiple linear regression (MLR), artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine regression (SVR) and decison tree regression (DTR) using temporal and spectral PPG features are evaluated. Principal component analysis (PCA) is used in order to reduce dimensionality. The MIMIC (Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care) database is used to train and evaluate the approaches. Results indicate that the proposal improves diastolic (DBP) and systolic (SBP) blood pressure estimation with mean absolute errors (MAE) of 6.52 ± 5.75 mmHg and 13.19 ± 11.90 mmHg, respectively.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cardoso, G. S., Lucas, M. G., Cardoso, S. S., Ruzicki, J. C. M., & Junior, A. A. S. (2022). Using PPG and Machine Learning to Measure Blood Pressure. In IFMBE Proceedings (Vol. 83, pp. 1909–1915). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_278

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free