Litter quality and interactive effects in litter mixtures: More negative interactions under elevated CO2?

55Citations
Citations of this article
99Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

1. The decomposition rate of litter mixtures can depend on interactions between compounds in the component species, i.e. in litter chemistry. Differences in litter N concentration are likely to lead to positive interaction (i.e. faster than expected decomposition) and differences in phenolic concentrations to a negative interaction. These interactions may become less positive (or more negative) when the litter is produced under elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations. 2. We measured respiration rates of litter from two contrasting species pairs, produced under ambient and elevated CO2. 3. As expected, mixtures of Calamagrostis epigejos and Vicia lathyroides, which differed strongly in litter N concentration, decomposed faster than expected, but the interaction disappeared under elevated CO2. 4. Despite the large difference in litter N concentration between Sphagnum recurvum and Carex rostrata, no interaction was observed in the ambient CO2 litter mixtures, and under elevated CO2, there was an unexpected positive interaction. 5. Interactions in litter mixtures can therefore change under elevated CO2, albeit not in a predictable manner, which would require correct prediction of species-specific litter chemistry and its response to elevated CO2.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text

This article is free to access.

821Citations
335Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hoorens, B., Aerts, R., & Stroetenga, M. (2002). Litter quality and interactive effects in litter mixtures: More negative interactions under elevated CO2? Journal of Ecology, 90(6), 1009–1016. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00732.x

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘240481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 37

43%

Professor / Associate Prof. 24

28%

Researcher 22

26%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50

57%

Environmental Science 33

38%

Social Sciences 2

2%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 2

2%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0