Selecting patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy: Electrical or mechanical dyssynchrony?

170Citations
Citations of this article
104Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) markedly reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure and prolonged QRS duration. Landmark trials have included over 4000 patients based on their electrocardiogram. A few small, observational, non-randomized, single centre studies of short duration have suggested that echocardiographic measurement of mechanical dyssynchrony may better identify patients likely to benefit from CRT. We objectively review the meaning and measurement of electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony, the strengths and weaknesses of echocardiographic indices of dyssynchrony, and the controversial issue of predicting response to treatment. We conclude that proposals to alter current guidelines for patient selection, and include echocardiography, are misguided. Echocardiographic assessment will only become credible and applicable to clinical practice once used to select patients for large prospective randomized trials which show an improvement in clinical outcome. © The European Society of Cardiology 2006. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hawkins, N. M., Petrie, M. C., MacDonald, M. R., Hogg, K. J., & McMurray, J. J. V. (2006, June). Selecting patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy: Electrical or mechanical dyssynchrony? European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi826

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free