COMPARISON BETWEEN CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHMS: GAUSSIAN MIXTURE MODEL - GMM AND RANDOM FOREST - RF, FOR LANDSAT 8 IMAGES

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: Given the importance of monitoring and managing land cover, especially in countries with continental proportions, such as Brazil. This research aimed to compare two remote sensing image classifier algorithms. Method/design/approach: The article compared the Gaussian Mixture Model and Random Forest classification algorithms, using Landsat 8 image, which was classified in a supervised way, in the Dezetsaka plugin of QGIS. The analysis of the performance of each model was performed using the Kappa index and Total Accuracy. Results and conclusion: The results showed that the Random Forest algorithm was more efficient than the Gaussian Mixture Model. Taking the Kappa Index (K) and Total Accuracy (po), the models obtained the following performances in the classification of classes: the Random Forest Model (K= 0.94 and po= 96.31) and the Gaussian Mixture Model obtained (K=0.85 and po=90.60). Research implications: The results can support the choice of classification method by researchers and others interested in monitoring land cover. Originality/value: This is a unique proposal, which compares an algorithm based on Machine Learning with another one from the category of probabilistic models. Interesting, since machine learning techniques have been gaining notoriety in several contexts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pantoja, D. A., Spenassato, D., & Emmendorfer, L. R. (2022). COMPARISON BETWEEN CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHMS: GAUSSIAN MIXTURE MODEL - GMM AND RANDOM FOREST - RF, FOR LANDSAT 8 IMAGES. Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.24857/RGSA.V16N3-015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free