Intraoperative Neck Angles in Endoscopic and Microscopic Otologic Surgeries

4Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To quantitatively compare the ergonomic risk of otologic surgeries performed with endoscopes and microscopes. Study Design: Observational cross-sectional study. Setting: Operating room of a tertiary academic medical center. Methods: Intraoperative neck angles of otolaryngology attendings, fellows, and residents were assessed during 17 otologic surgeries using inertial measurement unit sensors. Sensors were attached midline between the shoulder blades and on the posterior scalp of participants and were calibrated just prior to beginning each case. Quaternion data were used to calculate neck angles during periods of active surgery. Results: Endoscopic and microscopic cases included similar percentages of time in high-risk neck positions, 75% and 73%, respectively, according to a validated ergonomic risk assessment tool, the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment. However, microscopic cases included a higher percentage of time spent in extension (25%) compared to endoscopic cases (12%) (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Joo, H., Lin, Z., Yesantharao, L., Formeister, E., Razavi, C., Patel, M., … Galaiya, D. (2023). Intraoperative Neck Angles in Endoscopic and Microscopic Otologic Surgeries. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States), 168(6), 1494–1501. https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.226

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free