Novel models to identify census tracts for hepatitis c screening interventions

6Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Increased screening efforts and the development of effective antiviral treatments have led to marked improvement in hepatitis C (HCV) patient outcomes. However, many people in the United States are still believed to have undiagnosed HCV. Geospatial modeling using variables representing at-risk populations in need of screening for HCV and social determinants of health (SDOH) provide opportunities to identify populations at risk of HCV. Methods: A literature review was conducted to identify variables associated with patients at risk for HCV infection. Two sets of variables were collected: HCV Transmission Risk and SDOH Level of Need. The variables were combined into indices for each group and then mapped at the census tract level (n = 233). Multiple linear regression analysis and the Pearson correlation coefficient were used to validate the models. Results: A total of 4 HCV Transmission Risk variables and 12 SDOH Level of Need variables were identified. Between the 2 indexes, 21 high-risk census tracts were identified that scored at least 2 standard deviations above the mean. The regression analysis showed a significant relationship with HCV infection rate and prevalence of drug use (B = 0.78, P < .001), living below the poverty line (B = 0.014, P = .009), and median household income (B = -0.00, P = .009). Conclusions: Geospatial models identified high-priority census tracts that can be used to map high-risk HCV populations that may otherwise be unrecognized. This will allow future targeted screening and linkage-to-care interventions for patients at high risk of HCV.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ludden, T., Shade, L., Thomas, J., de Hernandez, B. U., Mohanan, S., Russo, M. W., … Tapp, H. (2020). Novel models to identify census tracts for hepatitis c screening interventions. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 33(3), 407–416. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2020.03.190305

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free