Effect of an intensive cervical traction protocol on mid-term disability and pain in patients with cervical radiculopathy: An exploratory, prospective, observational pilot study

8Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background Cervical radiculopathy is a relatively common and disabling condition involving local pain in the neck region and pain that radiates into the upper limb. Recent data suggest that cervical traction may effectively reduce disability and pain, with a dose-response relationship. The main aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the mid-term effect of an intensive cervical traction protocol for patients with cervical radiculopathy on disability, and to compare the effects with those reported by non-intensive protocols in the literature. Methods We conducted a prospective open observational study of 36 patients referred by their general practitioner for symptoms suggestive of cervical radiculopathy. All patients underwent the same treatment: a 30-minute cervical traction protocol, twice a day, for five consecutive days. The main objective was the evaluation of disability at 3 months. We evaluated at baseline (D1), the end of the protocol (D5) and at mid-term (M3) disability, cervical pain, radiating pain, pain on motor imagery, presence of neuropathic pain and medication consumption. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients for whom the Neck Disability Index improved by more than the minimum clinically important difference of 7 points by M3. Results Thirty-six patients were included in this study. The Neck Disability Index improved by more than the minimum clinically important difference in 48.3% at M3. Mean Neck Disability Index (p < .001), mean cervical VAS (p < .001), mean radiating VAS (p < .001), and mean VAS for imagined lateral flexion and rotation (p < .002) improved significantly from D1 to D5 and from D1 to M3. Consumption of medication reduced at each time point. The proportion of patients with neuropathic pain reduced from 61.1% at D1 to 33.3% at D5 and 48.3% at M3. Conclusion Disability reduced by more than the minimum clinically important difference in almost half of the participants following the intensive traction protocol. These results are encouraging and suggest that this complex condition can be treated with relatively simple methods. Copyright:

References Powered by Scopus

Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP)

3644Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation in health and disease

2527Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4)

2046Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The Efficacy of Cervical Lordosis Rehabilitation for Nerve Root Function and Pain in Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy: A Randomized Trial with 2-Year Follow-Up

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effect of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation technique on treating cervical radiculopathy

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

EFFECTS OF CERVICAL TRACTION AND INFRARED THERAPY ON PAIN INTENSITY AND NECK DISABILITY INDEX AMONG PEOPLE WITH CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS: A CROSS-OVER COHORT STUDY

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rulleau, T., Abeille, S., Pastor, L., Planche, L., Allary, P., Chapeleau, C., … Caulier, M. (2021). Effect of an intensive cervical traction protocol on mid-term disability and pain in patients with cervical radiculopathy: An exploratory, prospective, observational pilot study. PLoS ONE, 16(8 August). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255998

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

85%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Researcher 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 9

45%

Medicine and Dentistry 6

30%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

20%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free