From the “Neutral” Human Being to Gender Difference: Phenomenological and Dual Anthropology in Edith Stein

2Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Following Husserl’s lead, Edith Stein maintains that, on one hand, phenomenology can account for the universality of the structure of the human being and can give an essential description of the “phenomenon.” On the other hand, she is sensitive to the claims of the feminist movement and believes it is necessary to deepen the difference between male and female, not only by describing what constitutes the feminine but also what constitutes the masculine. In doing so, Stein brings something new to philosophical discourse. Additionally, she defends the singularity of the human being in which both male and female are present.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bello, A. A. (2016). From the “Neutral” Human Being to Gender Difference: Phenomenological and Dual Anthropology in Edith Stein. In Boston Studies in Philosophy, Religion and Public Life (Vol. 4, pp. 11–23). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21124-4_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free