Do not bet on the unknown versus try to find out more: Estimation uncertainty and "unexpected uncertainty" both modulate exploration

34Citations
Citations of this article
100Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Little is known about how humans solve the exploitation/exploration trade-off. In particular, the evidence for uncertainty-driven exploration is mixed.The current study proposes a novel hypothesis of exploration that helps reconcile prior findings that may seem contradictory at first. According to this hypothesis, uncertainty-driven exploration involves a dilemma between two motives: (i) to speed up learning about the unknown, which may beget novel reward opportunities; (ii) to avoid the unknown because it is potentially dangerous. We provide evidence for our hypothesis using both behavioral and simulated data, and briefly point to recent evidence that the brain differentiates between these two motives. © 2012 Payzan-LeNestour and Bossaerts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Payzan-LeNestour, É., & Bossaerts, P. (2012). Do not bet on the unknown versus try to find out more: Estimation uncertainty and “unexpected uncertainty” both modulate exploration. Frontiers in Neuroscience, (OCT). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00150

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free