Operationalizing vulnerability for social–ecological integration in conservation and natural resource management

24Citations
Citations of this article
127Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Sustaining human well-being is intimately linked to maintaining productive and healthy ecosystems. Avoiding trade-offs and fostering co-benefits is however challenging. Here, we present an operational approach that integrates biodiversity conservation, human development, and natural resource management by (1) examining resource and resource user interactions through the lens of social–ecological vulnerability (i.e., encompassing exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity); (2) identifying “ecocentric” and “sociocentric” interventions that directly address the ecological or social sources of vulnerability; (3) prioritizing those expected to yield co-benefits and minimize trade-offs; and (4) selecting interventions that are best suited to the broader local context. Application of this approach to a coral reef fishery in French Polynesia recommended a portfolio of development-, livelihood-, and ecosystem-based interventions, thus suggesting a shift from the current resource-focused approach toward a more social–ecological perspective. Our vulnerability-based approach provides practitioners with a valuable tool for broadening their set of management options, leading to escape from panacea traps.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thiault, L., Gelcich, S., Marshall, N., Marshall, P., Chlous, F., & Claudet, J. (2020, January 1). Operationalizing vulnerability for social–ecological integration in conservation and natural resource management. Conservation Letters. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12677

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free