Automatic True/False Question Generation for Educational Purpose

16Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In field of teaching, true/false questioning is an important educational method for assessing students’ general understanding of learning materials. Manually creating such questions requires extensive human effort and expert knowledge. Question Generation (QG) technique offers the possibility to automatically generate a large number of questions. However, there is limited work on automatic true/false question generation due to the lack of training data and difficulty finding question-worthy content. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised True/False Question Generation approach (TF-QG) that automatically generates true/false questions from a given passage for reading comprehension test. TF-QG consists of a template-based framework that aims to test the specific knowledge in the passage by leveraging various NLP techniques, and a generative framework to generate more flexible and complicated questions by using a novel masking-and-infilling strategy. Human evaluation shows that our approach can generate high-quality and valuable true/false questions. In addition, simulated testing on the generated questions challenges the state-of-the-art inference models from NLI, QA, and fact verification tasks.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zou, B., Li, P., Pan, L., & Aw, A. T. (2022). Automatic True/False Question Generation for Educational Purpose. In BEA 2022 - 17th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, Proceedings (pp. 61–70). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.bea-1.10

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

58%

Researcher 4

33%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 12

71%

Linguistics 2

12%

Social Sciences 2

12%

Neuroscience 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free