Pains, pills and properties - Functionalism and the first-order/second- order distinction

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Among philosophers of mind, it is common to assume that at least some mental properties are functional in nature, and that functional properties are second-order properties. In the functionalist literature, the notion of being a second-order property is cashed out in three different ways: (i) in terms of semantic features of characterizations or definitions of properties, (ii) in terms of syntactic features of second-order quantification, and (iii) in terms of a metaphysical criterion, according to which properties are second order if they are properties of first-order properties. It is shown that in the context of functionalism reference to these interpretations is misguided, and it is suggested that the notion of an ordering of properties in this context is best understood as being tied to dependence-relations. © 2012 The Author. dialectica © 2012 Editorial Board of dialectica.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Riel, R. (2012). Pains, pills and properties - Functionalism and the first-order/second- order distinction. Dialectica, 66(4), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-8361.12006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free