Published data on the association between E-cadherin (CDH1) -160 C/A polymorphism and prostate cancer (PCA) risk are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. A logistic regression approach proposed for molecular association studies was used to estimate a biological model of the gene effect. A total of 11 studies including 2637 cases and 2673 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Logistic regression analysis indicated that the CDH1 -160 C/A genotypes were associated with PCA risk. The genetic model test indicated that the genetic model was most likely to be dominant (CA+AA vs CC). Overall, meta-analysis indicated that the -160A allele carriers (CA+AA) had a 21% elevated risk of PCA, when compared with the homozygotes (CC) (odds ratio (OR) = 1.21; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.97-1.51; P = 0.090, Pheterogeneity = 0.001). In the subgroup analyses by ethnicity, significantly elevated risks were associated with -160 variant genotypes (CA+AA) in both European and Asian populations (OR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.08-1.43; P = 0.003, Pheterogeneity = 0.220 and OR = 1.54; 95% CI: 1.23-1.93; P<0.001, Pheterogeneity = 0.200). However, no significant associations were found in Africans (OR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.32-1.09; P = 0.090, Pheterogeneity = 0.070). Although some modest bias could not be eliminated, this meta-analysis suggests that the CDH1 -160A allele is a low-penetrant risk factor for developing PCA, especially in Europeans and Asians.
CITATION STYLE
Qiu, L. X., Li, R. T., Zhang, J. B., Zhong, W. Z., Bai, J. L., Liu, B. R., … Qian, X. P. (2009). The E-cadherin (CDH1) -160 C/A polymorphism and prostate cancer risk: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Human Genetics, 17(2), 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2008.157
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.