Do U.S. insurance firms offer the "wrong" incentives to their executives?

19Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We examine the relation between executive compensation and market-implied default risk for listed insurance firms from 1992 to 2007. Shareholders are expected to encourage managerial risk sharing through equity-based incentive compensation. We find that long-term incentives and other share-based plans do not affect the default risk faced by firms. However, the extensive use of stock options leads to higher future default risk for insurance firms. We argue that this is because option-based incentives induce managerial risk-taking behavior, which seeks to maximize managerial payoff through equity volatility. This could be detrimental to the interests of shareholders, especially during a financial crisis. © The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Milidonis, A., & Stathopoulos, K. (2011). Do U.S. insurance firms offer the “wrong” incentives to their executives? Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78(3), 643–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6975.2011.01418.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free