Treatment patterns and survival in an exhaustive French cohort of pazopanib-eligible patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS)

11Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The French EMS study prospectively collected exhaustive data from STS patients diagnosed in the Rhone-Alpes region from 2005 to 07. Methods: The database included diagnosis/histology, surgery, radiotherapy, systemic treatments and treatment response. Treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with metastatic disease, excluding adipocytic sarcoma and GIST were analyzed. Results: Of 888 total patients, 145 were included based on having metastatic disease and appropriate subtypes. All patients received treatment with systemic therapy being most common (74%, n=107), followed by radiotherapy (30%, n=44) and surgery (23%, n=33). Doxorubicin, alone or in combination, was the most common first line systemic therapy (65%, n=46). Drugs without license in sarcoma were used in 38-83% of treatments depending on treatment line. 24% of frontline patients demonstrated an objective response, decreasing to 11% objective responses in second line but no responses were documented beyond second line, with median PFS declining with each additional line. Median PFS also declined in patients receiving surgery compared to those receiving no surgery (8-15 m vs 5 m). Median OS from metastatic diagnosis for patients receiving systemic therapy was double that of patients without systemic treatment (24 m vs 12 m, p=0.007). Conclusions: Outcomes in this population were poor and declined with successive treatment. However, results suggest thGBRapies in recurrent sarcoma might be beneficial.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ray-Coquard, I., Collard, O., Ducimetiere, F., Laramas, M., Mercier, F., Ladarre, N., … Blay, J. Y. (2017). Treatment patterns and survival in an exhaustive French cohort of pazopanib-eligible patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS). BMC Cancer, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3057-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free