Clinical decision making - Choosing between intuition, experience and scientific evidence

12Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Intuition usually results in poorer decisions than an evidence-based decision-making process. However, research has shown there are certain circumstances when intuition is equivalent or superior to evidence based decision-making. The first pre-requisite is domain expertise and being a dentist is insufficient - a minimum of five years additional practicing experience is needed. Intuition allows the expert to store information in subconscious frameworks and extract that data without conscious thought at a rapid rate. Decisions that have severe time constraints, problems that are complex and ambiguous in nature, and a lack of scientific evidence are some factors that are suitable for intuition-based clinical decision-making process. Recognising these special situations will empower clinicians and help them to understand when not to use intuition but rely on the evidence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nalliah, R. P. (2016, December 16). Clinical decision making - Choosing between intuition, experience and scientific evidence. British Dental Journal. Nature Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.942

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free