Clinical effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer with a poor performance status

7Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard treatments for patients with lung cancer. PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA4 antibodies are chosen as the first-line therapy, contributing to the long-term survival and tolerability. Unlike molecular targeting agents, such as gefitinib, lung cancer patients with a poor performance status (PS) display unsatisfactory clinical improvements after ICI treatment. Several previous reports also demonstrated that the PS is identified as one of the most probable prognostic factors for predicting poor outcomes after ICI treatment. However, first-line pembrolizumab seemed to be effective for lung cancer patients with a PS of 2 if PD-L1 expression was greater than 50%. Currently, the induction of ICIs in patients with lung cancer with a poor PS is controversial. These problems are discussed in this review.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kaira, K., Imai, H., Mouri, A., Yamaguchi, O., & Kagamu, H. (2021, November 1). Clinical effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer with a poor performance status. Medicina (Lithuania). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57111273

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free