An online survey of Australian physicians reported practice with the off-label use of nebulised frusemide

4Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Off-label prescribing is common in palliative care. Despite inconsistent reports of the benefit of nebulised frusemide for breathlessness, its use continues to be reported. Methods. An online survey was emailed to 249 members of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Palliative Medicine to estimate the use of nebulised frusemide for breathlessness by Australian physicians involved in palliative care in the previous 12 months. Results: There were 52/249 (21%) respondents to the survey. The majority (44/52; 85%) had not prescribed nebulised frusemide in the previous 12 months. The most common (18/44; 43%) reason for not prescribing nebulised frusemide was a belief that there was not enough evidence to support its use. Whilst only a few respondents (8/52; 15%) reported having used nebulised frusemide, all that had used it thought there was at least some benefit in relieving breathlessness. Conclusion: This report adds to the series of case studies reporting some benefit from nebulised frusemide in relieving breathlessnes. © 2012 Newton et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Newton, P. J., Davidson, P. M., & Sanderson, C. (2012). An online survey of Australian physicians reported practice with the off-label use of nebulised frusemide. BMC Palliative Care, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-11-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free