Research collaboration in groups and networks: differences across academic fields

82Citations
Citations of this article
156Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to give a macro-picture of collaboration in research groups and networks across all academic fields in Norwegian research universities, and to examine the relative importance of membership in groups and networks for individual publication output. To our knowledge, this is a new approach, which may provide valuable information on collaborative patterns in a particular national system, but of clear relevance to other national university systems. At the system level, conducting research in groups and networks are equally important, but there are large differences between academic fields. The research group is clearly most important in the field of medicine and health, while undertaking research in an international network is most important in the natural sciences. Membership in a research group and active participation in international networks are likely to enhance publication productivity and the quality of research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kyvik, S., & Reymert, I. (2017). Research collaboration in groups and networks: differences across academic fields. Scientometrics, 113(2), 951–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2497-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free