Deregulation and Proactive Law As Regulative Innovations: A Case Study from Finland

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Regulation can be seen generally referring to policies where the government acts as a referee to oversee market activity and the behavior of private actors in the economy. In recent years, the regulatory landscape has changed and many industry sectors have been the subject of regulatory reform. In this chapter, we analyze and discuss the government proposals and bills recently given to Finnish Parliament, where such expressions as “enabling” and “freedom to choose” are frequently repeated. This kind of rhetoric is generally associated with more descriptive and elastic regulation. The research method in this chapter is a strategic review of scholarship on proactive law. We first provide a conceptual overview of proactive law, proactive approaches to law, legal innovation and disruptive innovation. We then give examples of how proactive law can be applied to regulation, both public and private, in order to create innovative regulation strategies. In conclusion, we discuss the outcomes that proactive law approaches yield for legislative reforms and their applications, and finally, we consider how future research should expand the theory of proactive law to encapsulate proactive law into regulative practices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sorsa, K., & Salmi-Tolonen, T. (2021). Deregulation and Proactive Law As Regulative Innovations: A Case Study from Finland. In Mapping Legal Innovation: Trends and Perspectives (pp. 357–381). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47447-8_15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free