Will Historical Archaeology Escape Its Western Prejudices to Become Relevant to Africa?

9Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A major problem facing North American approaches to historical archaeology is the exclusionary manner in which the discipline is defined. By confining historical archaeology to the era of capitalism and colonialism, we declare that the indigenous histories of many areas of the globe are of no interest to such an intellectual agenda. If we practice an historical archaeology that only valorizes the colonial experience, then what happens to history making that engaged cultures in the pre-capitalist and pre-modern era? Such approaches separate the histories of people in Africa from those of the West, and, is in effect, academic apartheid. To remedy this disjuncture, we interrogate how historical archaeology may escape the bounds of implicit racism in its denial of historicity before literacy. We suggest that breaking the chains of exclusion is the only way to realize an inclusive archaeology sensitive to all history making projects.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schmidt, P. R., & Pikirayi, I. (2018). Will Historical Archaeology Escape Its Western Prejudices to Become Relevant to Africa? Archaeologies, 14(3), 443–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-018-9342-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free