The clinician-scientist track: An approach addressing Australia's need for a pathway to train its future clinical academic workforce

18Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Clinician-scientist training represents the epitome of preparation for biomedical scientific discovery. The significance of, and need for, clinician-scientists is universally recognised as essential to progress medical research across what is regarded as the 'translational gap'. Despite a rich history of cutting-edge biomedical research, Australia has no infrastructure or career pathway for training clinician-scientists. Discussion: The Clinician-scientist Track (CST) was developed to address this concern at the University of Queensland. The CST concept began in 2010 with the Concurrent MD-Masters that allowed students to undertake a research Masters concurrently with their medical program. The rationale was to offer an attractive and realistic option to recruit our highest performing students into a research higher degree, with the underlying aim of encouraging those most capable, to transfer to the MD-PhD. The Concurrent MD-Masters was immediately popular and remains so. Over 8 years, enrolments rose seven-fold (60 MD-Masters, 36 MD-PhDs). The transfer rate from MD-Masters to MD-PhD is 28% supporting our original aim. Conclusions: Many challenges remain for the future of the program. These challenges are underpinned by a culture that values clinician-scientists as crucial to ensuring that high quality health and medical research is undertaken and translated to patient care, but lags behind in establishing an infrastructure to develop and maintain a new generation of this vital workforce. A future challenge is to develop a coordinated approach to a supported Australian MD-PhD pathway for our most talented and committed students beginning in the undergraduate Bachelor's degree into the medical degree and throughout specialty training. Shared responsibility is necessary between institutions and stakeholders to support and nurture newly trained MD-PhDs into the post-graduate years. Flexibility across this medical training continuum that allows integration of both degrees will help ensure students make the most meaningful connections between the research and the medicine. What is paramount will be acknowledging the career expectations of an emerging cohort of medical students, in particular females, wishing to pursue research. Without these considerations we risk losing our next generation of potential clinician-scientists.

References Powered by Scopus

Translational research: Crossing the valley of death

546Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The physician-scientist career pipeline in 2005: Build it, and they will come

311Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Are MD-PhD programs meeting their goals? An analysis of career choices made by graduates of 24 MD-PhD programs

174Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The experiences, attitudes and understanding of research amongst medical students at an Australian medical school

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

International perspectives of nurses, midwives and allied health professionals clinical academic roles: Are we at tipping point?

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A global view of the aspiring physician-scientist

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eley, D. S. (2018). The clinician-scientist track: An approach addressing Australia’s need for a pathway to train its future clinical academic workforce. BMC Medical Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1337-5

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

46%

Researcher 6

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 13

59%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

23%

Social Sciences 3

14%

Philosophy 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free