Survival after Rate-Responsive Programming in Patients with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator Implants Is Associated with a Novel Parameter: The Heart Rate Score

26Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background-Rate-responsive pacing (DDDR) versus nonrate-responsive pacing (DDD) has shown no survival benefit for patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) implants. The heart rate score (HRSc), an indicator of heart rate variation, may predict survival. We hypothesized that high-risk HRSc CRT-D patients will have improved survival with DDDR versus DDD alone. Methods and Results-All CRT-D patients in LATITUDE remote monitoring (2006-2011), programmed DDD, had HRSc calculated at first data upload after implant (median 1.4 months). Patients subsequently reprogrammed to DDDR 7.6 median months later were compared with a propensity-matched DDD group and followed for 21.4 median months by remote monitoring. Data were adjusted for age, sex, lower rate limit, percent atrial pacing, percent biventricular pacing, and implant year. The social security death index was used to identify deaths. Remote monitoring provided programming and histogram data. DDDR programming in CRT-D patients was associated with improved survival (adjusted hazard ratio =0.77; P<0.001). However, only those with baseline HRSc ≥70% (2308/6164) had improved HRSc with DDDR (from 88±9% to 78±15%; P<0.001) and improved survival (hazard ratio =0.74; P<0.001). Patients with a high baseline HRSc and significant improvement over time were more likely to survive (hazard ratio =0.63; P=0.006). For patients with HRSc <70%, DDDR reprogramming increased the HRSc from 46±11% to 50±15% (P<0.001); survival did not change. The HRSc did not change with DDD pacing over time. Conclusions-In CRT-D patients with HRSc ≥70%, DDDR reprogramming improved the HRSc and was associated with survival. Patients with lower HRSc had no change in survival with DDDR programming.

References Powered by Scopus

An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies

8397Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure

5592Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cardiac-Resynchronization Therapy with or without an Implantable Defibrillator in Advanced Chronic Heart Failure

5123Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Chronotropic Incompetence in Chronic Heart Failure A State-of-the-Art Review

90Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Importance of resting heart rate

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Device Histogram-Based Simple Predictor of Mortality Risk in ICD and CRT-D Patients: The Heart Rate Score

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Olshansky, B., Richards, M., Sharma, A., Wold, N., Jones, P., Perschbacher, D., & Wilkoff, B. L. (2016). Survival after Rate-Responsive Programming in Patients with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator Implants Is Associated with a Novel Parameter: The Heart Rate Score. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003806

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

52%

Researcher 7

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 20

74%

Computer Science 3

11%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

7%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free