MODIS vegetation products as proxies of photosynthetic potential along a gradient of meteorologically and biologically driven ecosystem productivity

35Citations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A direct relationship between gross ecosystem productivity (GEP) estimated by the eddy covariance (EC) method and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) vegetation indices (VIs) has been observed in many temperate and tropical ecosystems. However, in Australian evergreen forests, and particularly sclerophyll and temperate woodlands, MODIS VIs do not capture seasonality of GEP. In this study, we re-evaluate the connection between satellite and flux tower data at four contrasting Australian ecosystems, through comparisons of GEP and four measures of photosynthetic potential, derived via parameterization of the light response curve: ecosystem light use efficiency (LUE), photosynthetic capacity (Pc), GEP at saturation (GEPsat), and quantum yield (α) with MODIS vegetation satellite products, including VIs, gross primary productivity (GPPMOD) leaf area index (LAIMOD), and fraction of photosynthetic active radiation (fPARMOD). We found that satellite-derived biophysical products constitute a measurement of ecosystem structure (e.g. leaf area index-quantity of leaves) and function (e.g. leaf level photosynthetic assimilation capacity-quality of leaves), rather than GEP. Our results show that in primarily meteorological-driven (e.g. photosynthetic active radiation, air temperature, and/or precipitation) and relatively aseasonal ecosystems (e.g. evergreen wet sclerophyll forests), there were no statistically significant relationships between GEP and satellite-derived measures of greenness. In contrast, for phenology-driven ecosystems (e.g. tropical savannas), changes in the vegetation status drove GEP, and tower-based measurements of photosynthetic activity were best represented by VIs. We observed the highest correlations between MODIS products and GEP in locations where key meteorological variables and vegetation phenology were synchronous (e.g. semi-arid Acacia woodlands) and low correlation at locations where they were asynchronous (e.g. Mediterranean ecosystems). However, we found a statistical significant relationship between the seasonal measures of photosynthetic potential (Pc and LUE) and VIs, where each ecosystem aligns along a continuum; we emphasize here that knowledge of the conditions in which flux tower measurements and VIs or other remote sensing products converge greatly advances our understanding of the mechanisms driving the carbon cycle (phenology and climate drivers) and provides an ecological basis for interpretation of satellite-derived measures of greenness.

References Powered by Scopus

World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated

8981Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices

7454Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram

6429Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Remote sensing of the terrestrial carbon cycle: A review of advances over 50 years

411Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Remote sensing of dryland ecosystem structure and function: Progress, challenges, and opportunities

268Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An introduction to the Australian and New Zealand flux tower network - OzFlux

187Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Restrepo-Coupe, N., Huete, A., Davies, K., Cleverly, J., Beringer, J., Eamus, D., … Meyer, W. S. (2016). MODIS vegetation products as proxies of photosynthetic potential along a gradient of meteorologically and biologically driven ecosystem productivity. Biogeosciences, 13(19), 5587–5608. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-5587-2016

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 23

48%

Researcher 15

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 19

48%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13

33%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 5

13%

Engineering 3

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free