Digital distribution models reviewed: The content provider's perspective

2Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Digital distribution has surpassed physical distribution in key markets and will soon be the dominant music distribution model in Australia. Four different business models (free, ad-funded, pay-per-use and subscription-based) and two different music delivery methods (downloading and streaming) currently compete in the market place. The author analyses each distribution model available in Australia and evaluates advantages and disadvantages from the content provider's perspective. The most striking development is the blurring line between promotion and distribution. Content providers can either lower the barriers to access music in order to facilitate rapid music circulation and create a strong promotional effect to support various revenue streams; or heighten the barriers to access music in order to install an artificial scarcity through excludability, which is essential to implement a business model based on selling musical recordings. In this regard, the variety of different digital distribution models provides a flexible toolbox for content providers to coordinate their overall marketing strategy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peltz, P. (2013). Digital distribution models reviewed: The content provider’s perspective. In Music Business and the Experience Economy: The Australasian Case (pp. 99–117). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27898-3_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free