Rate of water loss and sugar uptake during the osmotic dehydration of pineapple

32Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Water loss, sucrose gain and the variation in concentration of other natural fruit sugars (glucose and fructose) were studied during osmotic dehydration of pineapple slices (0.6 mm thick) in sucrose solution (60 % w/w) at three temperatures (30, 40 and 50°C). As temperature increased from 30 to 50°C, the apparent moisture and sucrose diffusivities (Dw and Ds) increased 3.8 and 2.8 times, respectively, therefore, the dehydration efficiency index (Dw/Ds) increased with temperature. The loss of glucose and fructose increased with temperature too. It was found that the solute content was a linear function of the moisture content and this relation was independent of the temperature during the first 600 minutes of dehydration.

References Powered by Scopus

Water and solute diffusion coefficients of carrot as a function of temperature and concentration during osmotic dehydration

132Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mass transfer during osmotic dehydration of pineapple rings

128Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Osmotic concentration of potato. II. Spatial distribution of the osmotic effect

119Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Effects of drying and grinding in production of fruit and vegetable powders: A review

343Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Osmotic dehydration of fruits and vegetables: a review

256Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Review on Osmotic Dehydration of Fruits and Vegetables: An Integrated Approach

108Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ramallo, L. A., & Mascheroni, R. H. (2005). Rate of water loss and sugar uptake during the osmotic dehydration of pineapple. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 48(5), 761–770. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132005000600012

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 24

71%

Researcher 5

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21

49%

Engineering 12

28%

Chemical Engineering 8

19%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0