Lost in Causality: How Epidemiology’s Counterfactual Causal Inference Revolution Upholds Class, Race and Gender Inequities

  • Muntaner C
  • Dunn J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We critique empiricism, the dominant epistemology in epidemiology and public health from a scientific realist perspective. Building on our previous work, we also take on the popular counterfactual/potential outcomes epistemology based on its neglect of ontology and shunning causal mechanisms which are reduced to statistical methods (e.g., mediation). We the argue that ontology, epistemology, axiology and ethics constitute a philosophical system in epidemiology, and, in particular in social epidemiology and health equity/social inequalities research that ends up supporting capitalism, patriarchal/gendered and racialize social systems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Muntaner, C., & Dunn, J. R. (2019). Lost in Causality: How Epidemiology’s Counterfactual Causal Inference Revolution Upholds Class, Race and Gender Inequities. In Philosophical and Methodological Debates in Public Health (pp. 47–58). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28626-2_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free