Bacterial endophyte communities in Pinus flexilis are structured by host age, tissue type, and environmental factors

28Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background and aims: Forest tree microbiomes are important to forest dynamics, diversity, and ecosystem processes. Mature limber pines (Pinus flexilis) host a core microbiome of acetic acid bacteria in their foliage, but the bacterial endophyte community structure, variation, and assembly across tree ontogeny is unknown. The aims of this study were to test if the core microbiome observed in adult P. flexilis is established at the seedling stage, if seedlings host different endophyte communities in root and shoot tissues, and how environmental factors structure seedling endophyte communities. Methods: The 16S rRNA gene was sequenced to characterize the bacterial endophyte communities in roots and shoots of P. flexilis seedlings grown in plots at three elevations at Niwot Ridge, Colorado, subjected to experimental treatments (watering and heating). The data was compared to previously sequenced endophyte communities from adult tree foliage sampled in the same year and location. Results: Seedling shoots hosted a different core microbiome than adult tree foliage and were dominated by a few OTUs in the family Oxalobacteraceae, identical or closely related to strains with antifungal activity. Shoot and root communities significantly differed from each other but shared major OTUs. Watering but not warming restructured the seedling endophyte communities. Conclusions: The results suggest differences in assembly and ecological function across conifer life stages. Seedlings may recruit endophytes to protect against fungi under increased soil moisture.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carper, D. L., Carrell, A. A., Kueppers, L. M., & Frank, A. C. (2018). Bacterial endophyte communities in Pinus flexilis are structured by host age, tissue type, and environmental factors. Plant and Soil, 428(1–2), 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3682-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free