Prognostic role of serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma

13Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Serum levels of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) were shown to be associated with poorer prognosis in several cancers, but the prognostic role of CA 19-9 levels in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma was unclear. A retrospective cohort of 97 patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma was performed to assess the prognostic role of CA 19-9 levels on overall survival in hepatocellular carcinoma. Both Kaplan-Meier product-limit method and multivariate analysis were performed to determine the prognostic role of CA 19-9 levels. The results indicated that among those 97 patients, 24 (24.7 %) had elevated preoperative CA 19-9 levels (≥37 U/mL). Elevated serum CA 19-9 levels did not correlate with patient age, gender, tumor size, tumor stage, diabetes, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Kaplan-Meier product-limit method showed that patients with elevated CA 19-9 levels had poorer survival than those with normal CA 19-9 levels (log-rank test P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that elevated CA 19-9 level was a significantly independent predictor of poorer overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.56; 95 % confidence interval [95 % CI] 1.41–4.64, P = 0.002). In addition, tumor stages and multiple tumors were also independent predictors of poorer overall survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (P < 0.01). In conclusion, serum CA 19-9 levels have an independent prognostic role in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Elevated CA 19-9 level is significantly associated with poorer overall survival in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, J., Huang, T., Zhang, F., Xu, J., Chen, G., Wang, X., … Peng, Z. (2015). Prognostic role of serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Tumor Biology, 36(4), 2257–2261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-2435-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free